Best Diet Programs
Read this legislation as a threat to secede from the U.S. unless the government returns to the founding principles as laid down in the constitution and a reaffirmation of States Rights……. Then gimme your opinion,
HCR 6 – AS INTRODUCED
2009 SESSION
09-0274
09/01
HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 6
A RESOLUTION affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.
SPONSORS: Rep. Itse, Rock 9; Rep. Ingbretson, Graf 5; Rep. Comerford, Rock 9; Sen. Denley, Dist 3
COMMITTEE: State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs
ANALYSIS
This house concurrent resolution affirms States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.
09-0274
09/01
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Nine
A RESOLUTION affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.
Whereas the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire, Part 1, Article 7 declares that the people of this State have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves as a free, sovereign, and independent State; and do, and forever hereafter shall, exercise and enjoy every power, jurisdiction, and right, pertaining thereto, which is not, or may not hereafter be, by them expressly delegated to the United States of America in congress assembled; and
Whereas the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire, Part 2, Article 1 declares that the people inhabiting the territory formerly called the province of New Hampshire, do hereby solemnly and mutually agree with each other, to form themselves into a free, sovereign and independent body-politic, or State, by the name of The State of New Hampshire; and
Whereas the State of New Hampshire when ratifying the Constitution for the United States of America recommended as a change, “First That it be Explicitly declared that all Powers not expressly & particularly Delegated by the aforesaid are reserved to the several States to be, by them Exercised;” and
Whereas the other States that included recommendations, to wit Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island and Virginia, included an identical or similar recommended change; and
Whereas these recommended changes were incorporated as the ninth amendment, the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people, and the tenth amendment, the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people, to the Constitution for the United States of America; now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring:
That the several States composing the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their General Government; but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a General Government for special purposes, — delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force; that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral party, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party: that the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress; and
That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offences against the law of nations, slavery, and no other crimes whatsoever; and it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people,” therefore all acts of Congress which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so enumerated in the Constitution are altogether void, and of no force; and that the power to create, define, and punish such other crimes is reserved, and, of right, appertains solely and exclusively to the respective States, each within its own territory; and
That it is true as a general principle, and is also expressly declared by one of the amendments to the Constitution, that “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the Stat
view full text here:
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/hcr0006.html
can we help them leave?
Guard Sweeps –
Add omo-plata sweep.
Rock the base with x-guard sweep.
More Butterfly sweep variations.
Add spider guard sweeps.
Guard Submissions –
Triangle armbar combo.
Back Submissions –
Add Turtle submissions (clock choke, anaconda, brabo, peruvian etc.).
Add Body lock.
Misc –
Add some leg locks.
The Good –
Adding lots of wristlocks.
Smooth Transitions (in general).
Good hip movement.
Innovative moves.
The Bad –
The pace seems a little sedate (slow).
More variations needed.
Missed some basic moves in favor of advanced ones.
More conviction with finishing a move.
The moves were solid, but not perfect. Refining and Finesse needed in most aspects.
Duration : 0:9:23
NWA – Express Yourself
Good quality
Lyrics
Yo, man… There’s a lot of brothers out there flakin’ and perpetratin
But scared to kick reality.
Yo Dre, you’ve been doing all this dope producing.
You had a chance to show ‘em what time it is…
So, what you want me to do?
Express Yourself…
I’m expressin’ with my full capabilities,
And now I’m livin’ in correctional facilities,
Cause some don’t agree with how I do this.
I get straight, meditate like a Buddhist
I’m droppin’ flava, my behaviour is hereditary,
But my technique is very necessary.
Blame it on Ice Cube… Because he says it gets funky
When you got a subject and a predicate.
Add it on a dope beat
And that’ll make you think.
Some suckaz just tickle me pink
To my stomach. ‘Cause they don’t flow like this one.
You know what? I won’t hesitate to dis one
Or two before I’m through.
So don’t try to sing this!
Some drop science
Well I’m droppin’ English.
Even if Yella
Makes it a-capella
I still express, yo, I don’t smoke weed or assess
Cause its known to give a brother brain damage
And brain damage on the mic don’t manage
Nuthin’
But makin’ a sucker and you equal.
Don’t be another sequel…
Express Yourself…
Express Yourself…
Come on and do it…
Express Yourself…
Express Yourself…
Come on and do it…
Ice Cube, is not for the pop chart
So where should a brother like you start expressin yourself
My boy’ll show you how
Yo Dre
What Up?
Drop English Right about
Now, gettin’ back to the PG.
That’s program, and it’s easy.
Dre is back. Newjacks, I mean hollow,
Expressin’ ain’t their subject
Because they like to follow
The words, the style, the trend,
The records I spin.
Again and again and again
Yo, you on the other end.
Watch a brother playin’ dope rhymes with no help.
There’s no fessin’ and guessin’
While I’m expressin myself.
It’s crazy to see people be
What society wants them to be. But not me!
Ruthless…
Is the way to go
They know.
Others say rhymes that fail
To be original.
Or they kill where the hip-hop starts,
Forget about the ghetto
And rap for the pop charts.
Some musicians curse at home
But scared to use profanity
When up on the microphone.
Yeah, they want reality.
But you won’t hear none.
They rather exaggerate, a little fiction.
Some say no to drugs and take a stand,
But after the show they go lookin’ for the dopeman.
Or they ban my group from the radio.
Hear NWA and say “Hell no!”.
But you know it ain’t all about wealth.
As long as you make a note to…
Express Yourself…
Express Yourself…
Come on and do it…
Express Yourself…
Express Yourself…
Come on and do it…
A lyricist
Yo Dre is the name for that makes somethin dope on a record
thats what he came for
Kickin reality understand himself but its important that you keep it in mind to…
Express Yourself…
From the heart.
Cause if you wanna start to move up the chart
Then expression is a big part of it.
You ain’t efficient when you flow
You ain’t swift, movin’ like a tortoise.
Full of rigor mortis.
There’s a little bit more to show
I got rhymes in my mind, embedded like an embryo.
Or a lesson – all of ‘em expression
And if you start fessin’ -
I got a Smith and Wesson
For you.
I might ignore your record
Because it has no bottom.
I get loose in the summer, winter, spring and autumn
It’s Dre on the mic, gettin’ physical.
Doin’ the job
NWA is the lynch mob!
It’s so macabre
But you know you need this.
And the knowledge is growin’
Just like a fetus, or a tumor.
But here’s the rumor:
Dre is in the neighborhood
And he’s up to no good.
When I start expressin’ myself,
Yella, slam it!
Cause If I stay funky like this I’m doin’ damage.
Or I’mma be too hyped,
And need a straight jacket.
I got knowledge and other suckers lack it.
So, when you see Dre, a DJ on the mic,
Ask what it’s like.
It’s like we gettin’ hyped tonight.
Cause if I strike
It ain’t for your good health.
But I won’t strike if you just…
Express Yourself…
Express Yourself…
Come on and do it…
Express Yourself…
Express Yourself…
Come on and do it…
Express Yourself…
Come on and do it…
Come on and do it…
Come on and do it…
Come on and do it…
Duration : 0:4:34
http://www.gortn.com Real Talk Customer Comments with Dave Burke and Erik Sale: Real Talk eliminates debt and builds relationships for life.
Duration : 0:3:7
Read and compare:
Maven
In 2004, Maven experienced the biggest push in his career, even gaining a victory over then-Evolution member Batista. Maven then took part in a Survivor Series Elimination Match at Survivor Series 2004, teaming with Randy Orton, Chris Benoit, and Chris Jericho to face Triple H, Batista, Gene Snitsky, and Edge for the power to control Raw for one month. Maven was the first to control Raw, booking himself in a World Heavyweight Championship match against Triple H, who tried to get out of it by offering Maven a place in Evolution. He declined, but despite interference from Jericho, Benoit, and Orton, Triple H retained the title due to interference from Snitsky and Ric Flair. Maven turned into a villain two weeks later by turning on Eugene, assaulting him as revenge for his elimination in a Battle Royal on Raw. During this time, he entered an unofficial alliance with Simon Dean, serving as a successful user of the Dean character’s "Simon System" line of nutritional products. The team was split when Dean was traded to SmackDown!, and Maven was subsequently released by WWE on July 5, 2005. WWE cited decreased revenue and a lack of enthusiasm with respect to Maven’s in-ring ability as the cause of his release.
CM Punk
At the end of the pay-per-view Extreme Rules, Punk cashed in the Money in the Bank briefcase and defeated Jeff Hardy, whom had won the championship only one minute earlier from Edge, to win the World Heavyweight Championship for a second time. On the August 28 edition of Friday Night SmackDown, Punk concluded his program with Hardy and achieved his booked goal of excising him from the WWE, defeating Hardy in a steel cage match wherein the loser agreed to leave the company. At Breaking Point Punk defeated The Undertaker in a submission match to retain the World Heavyweight Championship. Undertaker originally won the match with his Hell’s Gate submission hold. SmackDown General Manager Theodore Long re-started the match after stating that the ban that former General Manager Vickie Guerrero had placed on the move was still in effect. Punk would win the match with his Anaconda vise when referee Scott Armstrong called for the bell despite Undertaker never submitting (reminiscent to the Montreal Screwjob, which took place in the same venue in 1997). The feud between the two continued and at the Hell in a Cell PPV, Punk lost the World Heavyweight Championship to The Undertaker in a Hell in a Cell match. On the November 6 edition of SmackDown, Punk was defeated by R-Truth due to a fast count from referee Scott Armstrong, leading to a feud between the two. On November 13, Punk defeated R-Truth due to an illegal pin. On the November 27 edition of SmackDown, Punk introduced Luke Gallows (formerly known as Festus) as his new follower.
You can’t compare Maven to CM Punk. Maven was a Tough Enough winner in the
WWE thats all he had to his credit and they paired him up with another jobber in
Simon Dean who was in my opinion a great wrestler in the old ECW days when he
wrestled under the name Nova, Super Nova and Hollywood Nova in ECW and when
they brought him to the WWE he was just a comedy act I couldnt believe that he
had been reduced to that. On the other hand, CM Punk is well rounded wrestler he
has been wrestling for a long time and has more experience in the wrestling industry
CM Punk was in Ring of Honor and he was the Heavyweight Champion for that ROH
organization. And he has wrestled in TNA Wrestling. When they signed CM Punk to
WWE he went thru the OVW training session and he worked his way up the ranks
by defeating the other wrestlers in the ECW roster. I saw him defeat The Hardcore
Icon Justin Incredible a few times on ECW. CM Punk was ECW World Heavyweight
Champion when he defeated John Morrison and he was the WWE World Heavyweight
Champion on RAW and Smackdown. I liked CM Punk’s gimmick being a straight edge
superstar and he won his matches and didn’t bother anybody now he’s taking this too
far with this straight edge gimmick who’s he to tell people how to live their lives if people
want to go out to bars and have a few beers thats fine just dont drink and drive and have
a designated driver to help you out. I have lost a lot of respect for CM Punk. CM punk he
cant beat The Undertaker theres no way he can do that the only one who can beat the
undertaker is Batista just like John Cena cant beat Batista Batista already beat John
Cena. I think that either Batista or CM Punk will win this years 2010 Royal Rumble they
were saying that Edge might return and be the number 30 surprise entry its too soon for
a return Edge’s injury takes at least 10 months to heal he will be back at Wrestlemania 26.
When you follow this link, you’ll need join for free to read the article. Or read the editorial page of your local newspaper for Sunday, March 15, 2009
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/13/AR2009031302539.html?sub=new
Seems like he’s confusing Voting Rights with Redistricting Districts.
http://www.census.gov/rdo/about_the_program/009945.html
What does the Public Law 94-171 require us to do? The Census Bureau will inform state governors and legislative leaders at least 4 years before each census of technical guidelines they must follow to obtain population totals for their locally defined voting districts (e.g., election precincts). The Census Bureau will also make public announcements of this program in the Federal Register.
Simple enough, this public law helps to keep records of how many people live in each district.
Voting Rights Act:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/42/1971.html
Again, simple enough, the Voting Rights act describes guidelines how determining the right to vote of citizens.
So, what about determining the borders of districts in which voters will cast their votes and why are the borders of some districts changed seeming at the will by some legislative actions of the past?
Seems like certain Panels are formed in some States at certain times to pressure the Legislature into approving changing the borders of certain districts that they want changed.
A Panel Lousianna has asked that the rules be changed?
http://www.houmatoday.com/article/20090217/HURBLOG/902179885?Title=Watchdog-group-suggests-independent-panel-redraw-lawmakers-voting-district-boundaries
Seems some Panel in Georgia want the districts boreders redrawn as well.
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-4247326.html
So what rule for changing the borders of some district allows this "questionable" act?
To find out, I decided to research how Supreme Court Decisions are entered into the United States Code and Federal Codes. Thus, following the example, each States Supreme Court could eventually get the placed into their States statutes.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/
More on keeping accurate population counts.
http://frwebgate5.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin
/TEXTgate.cgi?WAISdocID=170919287773+3+1+0&WAISaction=retrieve
Then I found how a US Code could be misinterpreted just by the way it’s unclearly written.
http://frwebgate5.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/TEXTgate.cgi?WAISdocID=171035281196+7+1+0&WAISaction=retrieve
An excerpt from it:
"…until the court enters such judgment no person shall be
denied the right to vote for failure to comply with such qualification, prerequisite, standard, practice, or procedure: Provided, That such qualification, prerequisite, standard, practice, or procedure may be enforced without such proceeding if the qualification, prerequisite, standard, practice, or procedure has been submitted by the chief legal officer or other appropriate official of such State or subdivision to the Attorney General and the Attorney General has not interposed an objection within sixty days after such submission, or upon good cause shown, to facilitate an expedited approval within sixty days after such submission, the Attorney General has affirmatively indicated that such objection will not be made. Neither an affirmative indication by the Attorney General that no objection will be made, nor the Attorney General’s failure to object, nor a declaratory judgment entered under this section shall bar a subsequent action to enjoin enforcement of such qualification, prerequisite, standard, practice, or procedure."
Then I needed to find Supreme Court Decisions that were used to reinforced the State Legislatures decisions to assign Panels who would decide on the new borders of such Voting Districts:
Seems that the new voting districts boundaries (borders) could be done under the auspices of "rezoning" rules in several states, without being questioned.
http://frwebgate5.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/TEXTgate.cgi?WAISdocID=171035281196+19+1+0&WAISaction=retrieve
Specifically:
http://frwebgate6.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/TEXTgate.cgi?WAISdocID=17239363632+7+1+0&WAISaction=retrieve
In closing, Zones are for residential, business, and agricultural purposes. When an agricultural zone is to be re-designated for business purposes, there seem to be few objections. However, when voting district boundaries are to be redrawn to get an advantage at the poles many people object to the practice. The Supreme Court shouldn’t be used to decide in favor of the practice. The Supreme Court should decide to outlaw the practice of redrawing the borders of Voting Districts because each States borders are not redrawn because the population has increased over the years.
George Will, I am sorry that your article, which started off so well written, became a "confused state of affairs."
What do you think Yahoo users? Will you read George Will’s article?
Will you read all of the
Thanks for your partial honesty, though Pelosi and fellow Democrats are not the ones who have redrawn Voting Districts boundaries time and time again. Certain Panels with Republican "foresight" have request the Legislature to approve such redrawn boundaries. When recently declined by the Legislature, they took it up with the Republican dominated Supreme Court. We are all watching what exactly their decision will be. If necessary, The legislature can challenge a Supreme Court Ruling.
I didn’t read it simply because I didn’t want to join…but I am agreeing here. In the Voting Rights Act just amended and passed by the Senate, they name a couple of states to redistrict ALONG with treating DC as a functioning state to give them representatives. Along with the census being taken from the Commerce Dept. and managed by others, specifically for gerrymandering. It’s become apparent that one party is intent on taking over permanently…and Pelosi at the helm of such a movement is dangerous. Everyone should be more than PISSED that our Congress thinks we are all stupid and will put up with it for much longer.
This is for both customers and salespeople alike (let’s be honest here). We all encounter different races & ethnicities in our great melting pot but in all honesty, which race/ethnicity do you think tends to be the worst in customer service and unprofessional & which race/ethnicity do you think tends to make the rudest customers? We know rudeness comes in all types, but which racial/ethnic group do you think has a higher percentage of giving bad service or bad attitude as a customer? (Please comment respectfully and tell your side of the story without derogatory comments or racial/ethnic slurs). Life experience stories more than welcome. I’m trying to research different facets of racism and where different people are coming from; so please include what you are when you are commenting.
After years of customer service jobs, and years as a consumer, there is no one race or ethnic group that stands out. People are obnoxious. That’s all there is to it. Some resent having to work, and some think the whole world needs to share their bad mood.
Monthly Statistics of Fur Affinity’s content and activities for the mouth of June 2009 supports Furry Arguments debunking Troll and Hater fallacies.
From Fur Affinity Live Journal entry dated Thursday June, 9, 2009
http://community.livejournal.com/furaffinity/
New Submissions: 107450
-General: 83141
-Mature: 12928
-Adult: 11381
Duration : 0:2:38
Ashley Tisdale Love // ashley-tisdale.org
Duration : 0:1:4
Customer Comments Series 1
Duration : 0:9:19